On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 16:57:21 +0300 Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> # stress-ng --clone 100 -t 10s --metrics-brief
> at 32-core machine shows boost 35000 -> 36000 bogo ops
>
> Patch 4/4 is a kind of RFC.
> Actually per-cpu cache of preallocated stacks works faster than buddy allocator thus
> performance boots for it happens only at completely insane rate of clones.
>
I'm not really sure what to make of this patchset. Is it useful in any
known real-world use cases?
> + This option neutralize stack overflow protection but allows to
> + achieve best performance for syscalls fork() and clone().
That sounds problematic, but perhaps acceptable if the fallback only
happens rarely.
Can this code be folded into CONFIG_VMAP_STACk in some cleaner fashion?
We now have options for non-vmapped stacks, vmapped stacks and a mix
of both.
And what about this comment in arch/Kconfig:VMAP_STACK:
This is presently incompatible with KASAN because KASAN expects
the stack to map directly to the KASAN shadow map using a formula
that is incorrect if the stack is in vmalloc space.
So VMAP_STACK_AS_FALLBACK will intermittently break KASAN?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
