On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 04:25:15PM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:38 PM, Minchan Kim <minchan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yub, bool could be more appropriate. However, there are lots of other places > > in kernel where use int instead of bool. > > If we fix every such places with each patch, it would be very painful. > > If you believe it's really worth, it would be better to find/fix every > > such places in one patch. But I'm not sure it's worth. > > > > Sure, I will create patch series and send it. Please don't. If you're touching a function for another reason, it's fine to convert it to return bool. A series of patches converting every function in the kernel that could be converted will not make friends. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
