Re: [PATCH 3/5] mm: Implement IO-less balance_dirty_pages()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri 04-02-11 14:09:16, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 02:38 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > +static int check_dirty_limits(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
> > +                             struct dirty_limit_state *pst)
> > +{
> > +       struct dirty_limit_state st;
> > +       unsigned long bdi_thresh;
> > +       unsigned long min_bdi_thresh;
> > +       int ret = DIRTY_OK;
> >  
> > +       get_global_dirty_limit_state(&st);
> > +       /*
> > +        * Throttle it only when the background writeback cannot catch-up. This
> > +        * avoids (excessively) small writeouts when the bdi limits are ramping
> > +        * up.
> > +        */
> > +       if (st.nr_reclaimable + st.nr_writeback <=
> > +                       (st.background_thresh + st.dirty_thresh) / 2)
> > +               goto out;
> >  
> > +       get_bdi_dirty_limit_state(bdi, &st);
> > +       min_bdi_thresh = task_min_dirty_limit(st.bdi_thresh);
> > +       bdi_thresh = task_dirty_limit(current, st.bdi_thresh);
> > +
> > +       /*
> > +        * The bdi thresh is somehow "soft" limit derived from the global
> > +        * "hard" limit. The former helps to prevent heavy IO bdi or process
> > +        * from holding back light ones; The latter is the last resort
> > +        * safeguard.
> > +        */
> > +       if ((st.bdi_nr_reclaimable + st.bdi_nr_writeback > bdi_thresh)
> > +           || (st.nr_reclaimable + st.nr_writeback > st.dirty_thresh)) {
> > +               ret = DIRTY_EXCEED_LIMIT;
> > +               goto out;
> > +       }
> > +       if (st.bdi_nr_reclaimable + st.bdi_nr_writeback > min_bdi_thresh) {
> > +               ret = DIRTY_MAY_EXCEED_LIMIT;
> > +               goto out;
> > +       }
> > +       if (st.nr_reclaimable > st.background_thresh)
> > +               ret = DIRTY_EXCEED_BACKGROUND;
> > +out:
> > +       if (pst)
> > +               *pst = st;
> 
> By mandating pst is always provided you can reduce the total stack
> footprint, avoid the memcopy and clean up the control flow ;-)
  OK, will do.

									Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]