On 04/02/18 23:37, Randy Dunlap wrote: [...] >> +reason, could neither be declared as constant, nor it could take advantage > > nor could it ok [...] >> +Ex: A policy that is loaded from userspace. > > Either > Example: > or > E.g.: > (meaning For example) ok [...] >> +Different kernel idrivers and threads can use different pools, for finer > > drivers :-( ok [...] >> + in use anymore by the requestor, however it will not become avaiable for > > requester; however, available ok [...] >> +- pmalloc does not provide locking support wrt allocating vs protecting > > Write out "wrt" -> with respect to. ok >> + an individual pool, for performance reason. It is recommended to not > > reasons. not to ok & ok [...] >> + in the case of using directly vmalloc. The exact number depends on size > > of using vmalloc directly. on the size ok & ok [...] >> +6. write protect the pool > > write-protect ok [...] >> +7. use in read-only mode the handlers obtained through the allocations > > handles ?? yes --- thanks, igor -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
