Re: [RFC PATCH v1 12/13] mm: split up release_pages into non-sentinel and sentinel passes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/02/2018 12:00 PM, Laurent Dufour wrote:
On 02/02/2018 15:40, Laurent Dufour wrote:


On 01/02/2018 00:04, daniel.m.jordan@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
A common case in release_pages is for the 'pages' list to be in roughly
the same order as they are in their LRU.  With LRU batch locking, when a
sentinel page is removed, an adjacent non-sentinel page must be promoted
to a sentinel page to follow the locking scheme.  So we can get behavior
where nearly every page in the 'pages' array is treated as a sentinel
page, hurting the scalability of this approach.

To address this, split up release_pages into non-sentinel and sentinel
passes so that the non-sentinel pages can be locked with an LRU batch
lock before the sentinel pages are removed.

For the prototype, just use a bitmap and a temporary outer loop to
implement this.

Performance numbers from a single microbenchmark at this point in the
series are included in the next patch.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  mm/swap.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
index fae766e035a4..a302224293ad 100644
--- a/mm/swap.c
+++ b/mm/swap.c
@@ -731,6 +731,7 @@ void lru_add_drain_all(void)
  	put_online_cpus();
  }

+#define LRU_BITMAP_SIZE	512
  /**
   * release_pages - batched put_page()
   * @pages: array of pages to release
@@ -742,16 +743,32 @@ void lru_add_drain_all(void)
   */
  void release_pages(struct page **pages, int nr)
  {
-	int i;
+	int h, i;
  	LIST_HEAD(pages_to_free);
  	struct pglist_data *locked_pgdat = NULL;
  	spinlock_t *locked_lru_batch = NULL;
  	struct lruvec *lruvec;
  	unsigned long uninitialized_var(flags);
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(lru_bitmap, LRU_BITMAP_SIZE);
+
+	VM_BUG_ON(nr > LRU_BITMAP_SIZE);

While running your series rebased on v4.15-mmotm-2018-01-31-16-51, I'm
hitting this VM_BUG sometimes on a ppc64 system where page size is set to 64K.

I can't see any link between nr and LRU_BITMAP_SIZE, caller may pass a
larger list of pages which is not relative to the LRU list.

You're correct, I used the hard-coded size to quickly prototype, just to see how this approach performs. That's unfortunate that it bit you.
 > To move forward seeing the benefit of this series with the SPF one, I
declared the bit map based on nr. This is still not a valid option but this
at least allows to process all the passed pages.

Yes, the bitmap's not for the final version.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux