Re: possible deadlock in get_user_pages_unlocked

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 05:46:26AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 09:35:02PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
> 
> > Try starting up multiple instances of the program; that sometimes helps with
> > these races that are hard to hit (since you may e.g. have a different number of
> > CPUs than syzbot used).  If I start up 4 instances I see the lockdep splat after
> > around 2-5 seconds.
> 
> 5 instances in parallel, 10 minutes into the run...
> 
> >  This is on latest Linus tree (4bf772b1467).  Also note the
> > reproducer uses KVM, so if you're running it in a VM it will only work if you've
> > enabled nested virtualization on the host (kvm_intel.nested=1).
> 
> cat /sys/module/kvm_amd/parameters/nested 
> 1
> 
> on host
> 
> > Also it appears to go away if I revert ce53053ce378c21 ("kvm: switch
> > get_user_page_nowait() to get_user_pages_unlocked()").
> 
> That simply prevents this reproducer hitting get_user_pages_unlocked()
> instead of grab mmap_sem/get_user_pages/drop mmap_sem.  I.e. does not
> allow __get_user_pages_locked() to drop/regain ->mmap_sem.
> 
> The bug may be in the way we call get_user_pages_unlocked() in that
> commit, but it might easily be a bug in __get_user_pages_locked()
> exposed by that reproducer somehow.

I think I understand what's going on.  FOLL_NOWAIT handling is a serious
mess ;-/  I'll probably have something to test tomorrow - I still can't
reproduce it here, unfortunately.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux