On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:27:00PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 08:00:36PM +0100, Eugeniu Rosca wrote: > > Hi Matthew, > > > > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 04:45:51PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 09:25:30PM +0100, Eugeniu Rosca wrote: > > > > Here is what I came up with, based on your proposal: > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Apologies for not knowing the process. Should I include the > > `Reviewed-by` in the description of the next patch or will it be > > done by the maintainer who will hopefully pick up the patch? > > It's OK to not know the process ;-) > > The next step is for you to integrate the changes you made here into a > fresh patch against mainline, and then add my Reviewed-by: tag underneath > your Signed-off-by: line. [PATCH v3] pushed to https://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=151680461529468&w=2 Thanks for your support! Best regards, Eugeniu. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
