On (01/23/18 15:40), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > Why do we even use irq_work for printk_safe? > ... perhaps because of wq: pool->lock -> printk -> call_console_drivers -> printk -> vprintk_safe -> wq: pool->lock Which is a "many things have gone wrong" type of scenario. Maybe we can workaround it somehow, hm. Tejun, can we have lockless WQ? ;) -ss -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>