On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 10:42:18AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 4:55 AM, Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > So really we should be casting 'b' and 'a' to uintptr_t to be fully
> > compliant with the spec.
>
> That's an unnecessary technicality.
>
> Any compiler that doesn't get pointer inequality testing right is not
> worth even worrying about. We wouldn't want to use such a compiler,
> because it's intentionally generating garbage just to f*ck with us.
> Why would you go along with that?
>
> So the only real issue is that pointer subtraction case.
>
> I actually asked (long long ago) for an optinal compiler warning for
> "pointer subtraction with non-power-of-2 sizes". Not because of it
> being undefined, but simply because it's expensive. The
> divide->multiply thing doesn't always work, and a real divide is
> really quite expensive on many architectures.
>
> We *should* be careful about it. I guess sparse could be made to warn,
> but I'm afraid that we have so many of these things that a warning
> isn't reasonable.
You mean like -Wptr-subtraction-blows?
FWIW, allmodconfig on amd64 with C=2 CF=-Wptr-subtraction-blows is not too large
The tail (alphabetically sorted) is
lib/dynamic_debug.c:1013:9: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction
lib/extable.c:70:28: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction
mm/memory_hotplug.c:1530:13: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction
mm/memory_hotplug.c:734:13: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction
mm/memory_hotplug.c:831:41: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction
mm/page_owner.c:607:38: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction
mm/vmstat.c:1334:38: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction
net/core/net-sysfs.c:1040:19: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction
net/ipv4/ipmr.c:3026:32: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction
net/ipv6/ip6mr.c:458:32: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction
net/mac80211/tx.c:1307:41: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction
net/mac80211/tx.c:1351:44: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction
net/rds/ib_recv.c:345:49: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction
net/rds/ib_recv.c:861:38: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction
net/sched/cls_tcindex.c:622:43: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction
net/sched/sch_cbs.c:302:35: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction
net/sched/sch_hhf.c:367:23: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction
net/sched/sch_hhf.c:434:38: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction
net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c:1377:43: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction
sound/pci/hda/hda_generic.c:301:20: warning: potentially expensive pointer subtraction
IOW it's not terribly noisy. Might be an interesting idea to teach sparse to
print the type in question... Aha - with
--- a/evaluate.c
+++ b/evaluate.c
@@ -848,7 +848,8 @@ static struct symbol *evaluate_ptr_sub(struct expression *expr)
if (value & (value-1)) {
if (Wptr_subtraction_blows)
- warning(expr->pos, "potentially expensive pointer subtraction");
+ warning(expr->pos, "[%s] potentially expensive pointer subtraction",
+ show_typename(lbase));
}
sub->op = '-';
we get things like
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:435:17: warning: [struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2] potentially expensive pointer subtraction
OK, the top sources of that warning are:
91 struct cpufreq_frequency_table
36 struct Indirect (actually, that conflates ext2/ext4/minix/sysv)
21 struct ips_scb
18 struct runlist_element
13 struct zone
13 struct vring
11 struct usbhsh_device
10 struct xpc_partition
9 struct skge_element
9 struct lock_class
9 struct hstate
7 struct nvme_rdma_queue
7 struct iso_context
6 struct i915_power_well
6 struct hpet_dev
6 struct ext4_extent
6 struct esas2r_target
5 struct iio_chan_spec
5 struct hwspinlock
4 struct myri10ge_slice_state
4 struct ext4_extent_idx
everything beyond that is 3 instances or less...
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
