On Wed 2018-01-17 11:18:56, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (01/16/18 10:45), Steven Rostedt wrote: > [..] > > > [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=145692016122716 > > > > Especially since Konstantin is working on pulling in all LKML archives, > > the above should be denoted as: > > > > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201603022101.CAH73907.OVOOMFHFFtQJSL%20()%20I-love%20!%20SAKURA%20!%20ne%20!%20jp > > hm, may I ask why? is there a new rule now to percent-encode commit messages? IMHO, the most important thing is that Steven's link is based on the Message-ID and the stable redirector https://lkml.kernel.org/. It has a better chance to work even in the future. I have been asked by other people to use this type of links as well. > > Although the above is for linux-mm and not LKML (it still works), I > > should ask Konstantin if he will be pulling in any of the other > > archives. Perhaps have both? (in case marc.info goes away). > > > > > Fixes: 6b97a20d3a79 ("printk: set may_schedule for some of console_trylock() callers") > > > > Should we Cc stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx? > > that's a good question... maybe yes, maybe no... I'd say this > change is "safer" when we have hand-off. I would keep it as is in stable kernels unless there are many bug reports. Best Regards, Petr -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
