On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 03:47:51PM +0100, Laurent Dufour wrote: > On 13/01/2018 05:23, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > Of course, we don't need to change them all. Try this: > > That would be good candidate for a clean up but I'm not sure this should be > part of this already too long series. > > If you don't mind, unless a global agreement is stated on that, I'd prefer > to postpone such a change once the initial series is accepted. Actually, I think this can go in first, independently of the speculative fault series. It's a win in memory savings, and probably shaves a cycle or two off the fault handler due to less argument marshalling in the call-stack. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
