On (01/15/18 17:08), Petr Mladek wrote: > > Besides the typos (which should be fixed)... > > > > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > JFYI, I have fixed the typos, updated the commit message for > the 1st patch and pushed all into printk.git, > branch for-4.16-console-waiter-logic, see > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pmladek/printk.git/log/?h=for-4.16-console-waiter-logic > > I know that the discussion is not completely finished but it is > somehow cycling. Sergey few times wrote that he would not block > these patches. It is high time, I put it into linux-next. I could > always remove it if decided in the discussion. Acked-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx> at least we have preemption out of printk->user way (one of the things I tried to tell you), which looks more like a step forward to me personally. p.s. the printk is still pretty far from what I want it to be. vprintk_emit() still can cause disturbance and damage in pretty unrelated places. e.g. hung tasks on console_sem, and so on. I'm going to keep my out-of-tree patches alive, may be they will be merged upstream in some form or another may be not. -ss -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
