Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > >> I am not completely following. You previously mentioned raw.log, which > >> is a collection of multiple programs, but now you seem to be talking > >> about a single reproducer. When syzbot manages to reproduce the bug > >> only with syzkaller program but not with a corresponding C program, it > >> provides only syzkaller program. It such case it can sense to convert. > >> But the case you pointed to actually contains C program. So there is > >> no need to do the conversion at all... What am I missing? > >> > > > > raw.log is not readable for me. > > I want to see C program even if syzbot did not manage to reproduce the bug. > > If C program is available, everyone can try reproducing the bug with manually > > trimmed C program. > > If it did not manage to reproduce the bug, there is no C program. > There is no program at all. > What!? Then, what does raw.log contain? I want to read raw.log as C program. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
