On Wed 10-01-18 15:43:17, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
[...]
> @@ -2506,15 +2480,13 @@ static int mem_cgroup_resize_limit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> if (!ret)
> break;
>
> - try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, 1, GFP_KERNEL, !memsw);
> -
> - curusage = page_counter_read(counter);
> - /* Usage is reduced ? */
> - if (curusage >= oldusage)
> - retry_count--;
> - else
> - oldusage = curusage;
> - } while (retry_count);
> + usage = page_counter_read(counter);
> + if (!try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(memcg, usage - limit,
> + GFP_KERNEL, !memsw)) {
If the usage drops below limit in the meantime then you get underflow
and reclaim the whole memcg. I do not think this is a good idea. This
can also lead to over reclaim. Why don't you simply stick with the
original SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX (aka 1 for try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages)?
> + ret = -EBUSY;
> + break;
> + }
> + } while (true);
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
