I think it would also be valuable to include a discussion of writeback testing, so perhaps we can go beyond simply large numbers of dd processes. On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to have one session about writeback. The content would highly > depend on the current state of things but on a general level, I'd like to > quickly sum up what went into the kernel (or is mostly ready to go) since > last LSF (handling of background writeback, livelock avoidance), what is > being worked on - IO-less balance_dirty_pages() (if it won't be in the > mostly done section), what other things need to be improved (kswapd > writeout, writeback_inodes_sb_if_idle() mess, come to my mind now) > > Honza > -- > Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > SUSE Labs, CR > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: <a href