On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 12:25 PM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon 08-01-18 11:44:02, Dan Williams wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 3:26 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> wrote: >> > Any chance to get this fully reviewed and picked up before the >> > end of the merge window? >> >> I'm fine carrying these through the nvdimm tree, but I'd need an ack >> from the mm folks for all the code touches related to arch_add_memory. > > I am sorry to be slow here but I am out of time right now - yeah having > a lot of fun kaiser time. I didn't get to look at these patches at all > yet but the changelog suggests that you want to remove vmem_altmap. > I've had plans to (ab)use this for self hosted struct pages for memory > hotplug http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170801124111.28881-1-mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx > That work is stalled though because it is buggy and I was too busy to > finish that work. Anyway, if you believe that removing vmem_altmap is a > good step in general I will find another way. I wasn't really happy how > the whole thing is grafted to the memory hotplug and (ab)used it only > because it was handy and ready for reuse. You misread, these are keeping vmem_altmap and cleaning up the usage to pass the vmem_altmap pointer through all paths rather than the tricky radix lookup we were doing previously. > Anyway if you need a review of mm parts from me, you will have to wait > some more. If this requires some priority then go ahead and merge > it. Times are just too crazy right now. Since you were planning on reusing vmem_altmap I think these patches make your job easier. I don't see the risk in merging these, we've squeezed out a few bugs and all the nvdimm unit tests are passing. > Sorry about that. No worries, quite a few of us are in that same boat. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>