On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 12:44:17PM -0800, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > I'm not sure I agree with this part. What if we add a new TCP lock class > for connections which are used for filesystems/network block devices/...? > Yes, it'll be up to each user to set the lockdep classification correctly, > but that's a relatively small number of places to add annotations, > and I don't see why it wouldn't work. I was exagerrating a bit for effect, I admit. (but only a bit). It can probably be for all TCP connections that are used by kernel code (as opposed to userspace-only TCP connections). But it would probably have to be each and every device-mapper instance, each and every block device, each and every mounted file system, each and every bdi object, etc. The point I was trying to drive home is that "all we have to do is just classify everything well or just invalidate the right lock objects" is a massive understatement of the complexity level of what would be required, or the number of locks/completion handlers that would have to be blacklisted. - Ted -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
