Hi Manfred,
On 20 December 2017 at 09:32, Dr. Manfred Spraul
<manfred@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> On 12/19/2017 10:48 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> we have been contacted by our partner about the following permission
>> discrepancy
>> 1. Create a shared memory segment with permissions 600 with user A using
>> shmget(key, 1024, 0600 | IPC_CREAT)
>> 2. ipcs -m should return an output as follows:
>>
>> ------ Shared Memory Segments --------
>> key shmid owner perms bytes nattch status
>> 0x58b74326 759562241 A 600 1024 0
>>
>> 3. Try to read the metadata with shmctl(0, SHM_STAT,...) as user B.
>> 4. shmctl will return -EACCES
>>
>> The supper set information provided by shmctl can be retrieved by
>> reading /proc/sysvipc/shm which does not require read permissions
>> because it is 444.
>>
>> It seems that the discrepancy is there since ae7817745eef ("[PATCH] ipc:
>> add generic struct ipc_ids seq_file iteration") when the proc interface
>> has been introduced. The changelog is really modest on information or
>> intention but I suspect this just got overlooked during review. SHM_STAT
>> has always been about read permission and it is explicitly documented
>> that way.
>
> Are you sure that this patch changed the behavior?
> The proc interface is much older.
Yes, I think that's correct. The /proc/sysvipc interface appeared in
2.3.x, and AFAIK the behavior was already different from *_STAT back
then.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
