On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 09:48:49PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> Well, for example seeing a 0xfffffffffffffff4 where a pointer to object
> must have been is a pretty strong hint to start looking for a way for
> that ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) having ended up there... Something like
> 0x6e69622f7273752f is almost certainly a misplaced "/usr/bin", i.e. a
> pathname overwriting whatever it ends up in, etc. And yes, I have run
> into both of those in real life.
>
> Debugging the situation when crap value has ended up in place of a
> pointer is certainly a case where you do want to see what exactly has
> ended up in there...
Linus, how would you feel about printing ERR_PTRs without molestation?
It's not going to leak any information about the kernel address space
layout. I'm a little less certain about trying to detect ASCII strings,
but I think this is an improvement.
diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c
index 01c3957b2de6..c80c60b4b3ef 100644
--- a/lib/vsprintf.c
+++ b/lib/vsprintf.c
@@ -1859,6 +1859,9 @@ char *pointer(const char *fmt, char *buf, char *end, void *ptr,
return string(buf, end, "(null)", spec);
}
+ if (IS_ERR(ptr))
+ return pointer_string(buf, end, ptr, spec);
+
switch (*fmt) {
case 'F':
case 'f':
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
