Hello, On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 07:12:19AM -0800, Shakeel Butt wrote: > Yes, there are pros & cons, therefore we should give users the option > to select the API that is better suited for their use-cases and Heh, that's not how API decisions should be made. The long term outcome would be really really bad. > environment. Both approaches are not interchangeable. We use memsw > internally for use-cases I mentioned in commit message. This is one of > the main blockers for us to even consider cgroup-v2 for memory > controller. Let's concentrate on the use case. I couldn't quite understand what was missing from your description. You said that it'd make things easier for the centralized monitoring system which isn't really a description of a use case. Can you please go into more details focusing on the eventual goals (rather than what's currently implemented)? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>