Re: [patch 13/16] x86/ldt: Introduce LDT write fault handler

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 11:21 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> That has nothing to do with the user installed LDT. The kernel does not use
> and rely on LDT at all.

Sure it does. We end up loading the selector for %gs and %fs, and
those selectors end up being connected with whatever user-mode has set
up for them.

We then set the FS/GS base pointer to a kernel-specific value, but
that is _separately_ from the actual accessed bit that is in the
selector.

So the kernel doesn't care, but the kernel definitely uses them.

                 Linus

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux