On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:39:12 +0900 Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:27:29 +0900 > KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Thanks to Johanns and Daisuke for suggestion. > > = > > Hugepage allocation shouldn't trigger oom. > > Allocation failure is not fatal. > > > > Orignal-patch-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > IIUC, this patch isn't necessary because we don't go into oom > in "page_size > PAGE_SIZE" case after [2/4]. > But I think it's not so bad to show explicitly that we don't cause oom in > THP charge. > > Acked-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Thank you for clarification. -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>