On 12/5/17 6:34 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Since uv_flush_tlb_others() implements flush_tlb_others() which is
about flushing user mappings, we should use __flush_tlb_single(),
which too is about flushing user mappings.
Cc: Andrew Banman<abanman@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Mike Travis<mike.travis@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)<peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/uv/tlb_uv.c
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static void bau_process_message(struct m
local_flush_tlb();
stat->d_alltlb++;
} else {
- __flush_tlb_one(msg->address);
+ __flush_tlb_single(msg->address);
stat->d_onetlb++;
}
stat->d_requestee++;
This looks like the right thing to do. We'll be testing it and complain later if
we find any problems, but I'm not expecting any since this patch looks to
maintain our status quo.
Best,
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
