On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:47:59 +0100 Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu 27-01-11 18:48:27, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > > Could you try to write a patch for feature-removal-schedule.txt > > and tries to remove noswapaccount and do clean up all ? > > (And add warning to noswapaccount will be removed.....in 2.6.40) > > Sure, no problem. What do you think about the following patch? > --- > From a597421909a3291886345565c73102117a52301e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:41:01 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] memsw: Deprecate noswapaccount kernel parameter and schedule it for removal > > noswapaccount couldn't be used to control memsw for both on/off cases so > we have added swapaccount[=0|1] parameter. This way we can turn the > feature in two ways noswapaccount resp. swapaccount=0. We have kept the > original noswapaccount but I think we should remove it after some time > as it just makes more command line parameters without any advantages and > also the code to handle parameters is uglier if we want both parameters. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx> > Requested-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Nice!. Thank you. Acked-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Maybe other discussion as 2.6.40 is too early or some may happen. But Ack from me, at least. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>