Re: [PATCH] mm: check pfn_valid first in zero_resv_unavail

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri 01-12-17 17:29:51, Dave Young wrote:
> On 12/01/17 at 10:19am, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 01-12-17 16:56:57, Dave Young wrote:
> > > On 11/30/17 at 10:35am, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > Can we exclude that range from the memblock allocator instead? E.g. what
> > > > happens if somebody allocates from that range?
> > > 
> > > It is a EFI BGRT image buffer provided by firmware, they are reserved
> > > always and can not be used to allocate memory.
> > 
> > Hmm, I see but I was actually suggesting to remove this range from the
> > memblock allocator altogether (memblock_remove) as it shouldn't be there
> > in the first place.
> 
> Oh, I'm not sure because it is introduced as a way for efi to reserve
> boot services areas to be persistent across kexec reboot. See
> drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c: efi_mem_reserve(), BGRT is only one user
> of it, there is esrt and maybe other users, I do not know if it is safe
> :(

Hmm, so it this range ever backed by a valid pfn?
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux