Re: Re: [PATCH 1/1] stackdepot: interface to check entries and size of stackdepot.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri 24-11-17 11:57:07, Vaneet Narang wrote:
[...]
> > OK, so debugging a debugging facility... I do not think we want to
> > introduce a lot of code for something like that.
> 
> We enabled stackdepot on our system and realised, in long run stack depot consumes
> more runtime memory then it actually needs. we used shared patch to debug this issue. 
> stack stores following two unique entries. Page allocation done in interrupt 
> context will generate a unique stack trace. Consider following two entries.
[...]
> We have been getting similar kind of such entries and eventually
> stackdepot reaches Max Cap. So we found this interface useful in debugging
> stackdepot issue so shared in community.

Then use it for internal debugging and provide a code which would scale
better on smaller systems. We do not need this in the kernel IMHO. We do
not merge all the debugging patches we use for internal development.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux