Re: [PATCH] mm,vmscan: Mark register_shrinker() as __must_check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 23/11/2017 07:34, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> >> Just fix the numa aware shrinkers, as they are the only ones that
> >> will have this problem. There are only 6 of them, and only the 3
> >> that existed at the time that register_shrinker() was changed to
> >> return an error fail to check for an error. i.e. the superblock
> >> shrinker, the XFS dquot shrinker and the XFS buffer cache shrinker.
> >
> > You are assuming the "too small to fail" memory-allocation rule
> > by ignoring that this problem is caused by fault injection.
> 
> Fault injection should also obey the too small to fail rule, at least by
> default.
> 

Pardon? Most allocation requests in the kernel are <= 32KB.
Such change makes fault injection useless. ;-)

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux