Re: [PATCH 09/25] ia64: Preemptible mmu_gather

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  struct mmu_gather {
>        struct mm_struct        *mm;
>        unsigned int            nr;             /* == ~0U => fast mode */
> +       unsigned int            max;
>        unsigned char           fullmm;         /* non-zero means full mm flush */
>        unsigned char           need_flush;     /* really unmapped some PTEs? */
>        unsigned long           start_addr;
>        unsigned long           end_addr;
> -       struct page             *pages[FREE_PTE_NR];
> +       struct page             **pages;
> +       struct page             *local[8];
>  };

Overall it looks OK - builds, boots & runs too. One question about
the above bit ... why "8" elements in the local[] array?  This ought to be
a #define, maybe with a comment explaining the significance. It doesn't
seem to fill out struct mmu_gather to some "nice" size.  I can't think
of why batching 8 at a time (in the fallback cannot allocate **pages case)
is a good number. So is there some science to the choice, or did you
pluck 8 out of the air?

Thanks

-Tony

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]