Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm,vmscan: Kill global shrinker lock.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:25:26AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 17-11-17 09:35:21, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 06:37:42AM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > Since do_shrink_slab() can reschedule, we cannot protect shrinker_list
> > > using one RCU section. But using atomic_inc()/atomic_dec() for each
> > > do_shrink_slab() call will not impact so much.
> > 
> > But you could use SRCU..
> 
> Davidlohr has tried that already http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1434398602.1903.15.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> and failed. Doing SRCU inside core kernel is not seen with a great
> support...

I can't actually find any objection in that thread.  What's the problem
Davidlohr ran into?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux