Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm: introduce MAP_FIXED_SAFE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/16/2017 11:18 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
+	if (flags & MAP_FIXED_SAFE) {
+		struct vm_area_struct *vma = find_vma(mm, addr);
+
+		if (vma && vma->vm_start <= addr)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+	}

Could you pick a different error code which cannot also be caused by a an unrelated, possibly temporary condition? Maybe EBUSY or EEXIST?

This would definitely help with application-based randomization of mappings, and there, actual ENOMEM and this error would have to be handled differently.

Thanks,
Florian

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux