On Mon, 13 Nov 2017, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 08:14:54PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > It will succeed with 5-level paging.
> > >
> > > And why is this allowed?
> > >
> > > > It should be safe as with 4-level paging such request would fail and it's
> > > > reasonable to expect that userspace is not relying on the failure to
> > > > function properly.
> > >
> > > Huch?
> > >
> > > The first rule when looking at user space is that is broken or
> > > hostile. Reasonable and user space are mutually exclusive.
> >
> > Aside of that in case of get_unmapped_area:
> >
> > If va_unmapped_area() fails, then the address and the len which caused the
> > overlap check to trigger are handed in to arch_get_unmapped_area(), which
> > again can create an invalid mapping if I'm not missing something.
> >
> > If mappings which overlap the boundary are invalid then we have to make
> > sure at all ends that they wont happen.
>
> They are not invalid.
>
> The patch tries to address following theoretical issue:
>
> We have an application that tries, for some reason, to allocate memory
> with mmap(addr), without MAP_FIXED, where addr is near the borderline of
> 47-bit address space and addr+len is above the border.
>
> On 4-level paging machine this request would succeed, but the address will
> always be within 47-bit VA -- cannot allocate by hint address, ignore it.
>
> If the application cannot handle high address this might be an issue on
> 5-level paging machine as such call would succeed *and* allocate memory by
> the specified hint address. In this case part of the mapping would be
> above the border line and may lead to misbehaviour.
>
> I hope this makes any sense :)
I can see where you are heading to. Now the case I was looking at is:
arch_get_unmapped_area_topdown()
addr0 = addr;
....
if (addr) {
if (cross_border(addr, len))
goto get_unmapped_area;
...
}
get_unmapped_area:
...
if (addr > DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW && !in_compat_syscall())
^^^ evaluates to false because addr < DEFAULT_MAP_WINDOW
addr - vm_unmapped_area(&info);
^^^ fails for whatever reason.
bottomup:
return arch_get_unmapped_area(.., addr0, len, ....);
AFAICT arch_get_unmapped_area() can allocate a mapping which crosses the
border, i.e. a mapping which you want to prevent for the !MAP_FIXED case.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
