Michal Hocko wrote: > > So, I believe that the changelog is not wrong, and I don't want to preserve > > > > keep very high watermark here, this is only to catch a parallel oom killing, > > we must fail if we're still under heavy pressure > > > > part which lost strong background. > > I do not see how. You simply do not address the original concern Andrea > had and keep repeating unrelated stuff. What does "address the original concern Andrea had" mean? I'm still thinking that the original concern Andrea had is no longer valid in the current code because precondition has changed. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
