On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:34:31 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This is a set of patches which I'm now testing, and it seems it passed > small test. So I post this. > > Some are bug fixes and other are clean ups but I think these are for 2.6.38. > > Brief decription > > [1/7] remove buggy comment and use better name for mem_cgroup_move_parent() > The fixes for mem_cgroup_move_parent() is already in mainline, this is > an add-on. > > [2/7] a bug fix for a new function mem_cgroup_split_huge_fixup(), > which was recently merged. > > [3/7] prepare for fixes in [4/7],[5/7]. This is an enhancement of function > which is used now. > > [4/7] fix mem_cgroup_charge() for THP. By this, memory cgroup's charge function > will handle THP request in sane way. > > [5/7] fix khugepaged scan condition for memcg. > This is a fix for hang of processes under small/buzy memory cgroup. > > [6/7] rename vairable names to be page_size, nr_pages, bytes rather than > ambiguous names. > > [7/7] some memcg function requires the caller to initialize variable > before call. It's ugly and fix it. > > > I think patch 1,2,3,4,5 is urgent ones. But I think patch "5" needs some > good review. But without "5", stress-test on small memory cgroup will not > run succesfully. > I'll rebase this set to onto http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=129559263207634&w=2 and post v2. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>