On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 02:08:20AM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: >> Yeah x86 is not entirely broken, just some .config, and it's not > > Like in this case sometime when I say x86 I mean x86_32, for clarity > x86_64 has never been affected by this, regardless of the .config. > >> common code bug (which is the most important thing!). I think it's a >> bug in set_pmd_at when paravirt is set and PSA is off. If I'm right 4m >> pages with PSA off should also work when disabling paravirt. > > You said PSA and I kept saying it but I think we both meant > PAE. There's PSE and PAE, PSA is mix ;). Yes. It was typo. :) > >> I'm just trying to reproduce... > > Reproduced and fix posted in the other mail with lkml on CC. Hope it > works! Will test and report the result. > > Thanks, > Andrea > -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>