On Fri, 2017-11-03 at 11:02 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Also, checkpatch says > > WARNING: use of in_atomic() is incorrect outside core kernel code > #43: FILE: mm/memory.c:4491: > + if (in_atomic()) > > I don't recall why we did that, but perhaps this should be revisited? Is the comment above in_atomic() still up-to-date? From <linux/preempt.h>: /* * Are we running in atomic context? WARNING: this macro cannot * always detect atomic context; in particular, it cannot know about * held spinlocks in non-preemptible kernels. Thus it should not be * used in the general case to determine whether sleeping is possible. * Do not use in_atomic() in driver code. */ #define in_atomic() (preempt_count() != 0) Bart.��.n������g��� �a��� �&ޖ)���)��h���&������梷���� �Ǟ�m������)������^�����������v���O��zf������
