Re: [PATCH] mm: Handle 0 flags in _calc_vm_trans() macro

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 4:21 AM, Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> _calc_vm_trans() does not handle the situation when some of the passed
> flags are 0 (which can happen if these VM flags do not make sense for
> the architecture). Improve the _calc_vm_trans() macro to return 0 in
> such situation. Since all passed flags are constant, this does not add
> any runtime overhead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/mman.h | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Dan, can you please prepend this patch before my series so that we don't
> break bisectability? This fixes the reported problem for me when arch
> does not define MAP_SYNC. Thanks!
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mman.h b/include/linux/mman.h
> index 8f7cc87828e6..3427bf3daef5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mman.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mman.h
> @@ -105,8 +105,9 @@ static inline bool arch_validate_prot(unsigned long prot)
>   * ("bit1" and "bit2" must be single bits)
>   */
>  #define _calc_vm_trans(x, bit1, bit2) \
> +  ((!(bit1) || !(bit2)) ? 0 : \
>    ((bit1) <= (bit2) ? ((x) & (bit1)) * ((bit2) / (bit1)) \
> -   : ((x) & (bit1)) / ((bit1) / (bit2)))
> +   : ((x) & (bit1)) / ((bit1) / (bit2))))
>

Looks good to me, thanks Jan.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux