Wei Wang wrote: > @@ -164,6 +284,8 @@ static unsigned fill_balloon(struct virtio_balloon *vb, size_t num) > break; > } > > + if (use_sg && xb_set_page(vb, page, &pfn_min, &pfn_max) < 0) Isn't this leaking "page" ? > + break; > balloon_page_push(&pages, page); > } > > @@ -184,8 +307,12 @@ static unsigned fill_balloon(struct virtio_balloon *vb, size_t num) > > num_allocated_pages = vb->num_pfns; > /* Did we get any? */ > - if (vb->num_pfns != 0) > - tell_host(vb, vb->inflate_vq); > + if (vb->num_pfns) { > + if (use_sg) > + tell_host_sgs(vb, vb->inflate_vq, pfn_min, pfn_max); Please describe why tell_host_sgs() can work without __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM allocation, for tell_host_sgs() is called with vb->balloon_lock mutex held. > + else > + tell_host(vb, vb->inflate_vq); > + } > mutex_unlock(&vb->balloon_lock); > > return num_allocated_pages; > @@ -223,7 +353,13 @@ static unsigned leak_balloon(struct virtio_balloon *vb, size_t num) > page = balloon_page_dequeue(vb_dev_info); > if (!page) > break; > - set_page_pfns(vb, vb->pfns + vb->num_pfns, page); > + if (use_sg) { > + if (xb_set_page(vb, page, &pfn_min, &pfn_max) < 0) Isn't this leaking "page" ? If this is inside vb->balloon_lock mutex (isn't this?), xb_set_page() must not use __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM allocation, for leak_balloon_sg_oom() will be blocked on vb->balloon_lock mutex. > + break; > + } else { > + set_page_pfns(vb, vb->pfns + vb->num_pfns, page); > + } > + > list_add(&page->lru, &pages); > vb->num_pages -= VIRTIO_BALLOON_PAGES_PER_PAGE; > } -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>