Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] mm: buddy page accessed before initialized

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 11/02/2017 09:54 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Thu 02-11-17 09:39:58, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
[...]
Hi Michal,

Previously as before my project? That is because memory for all struct pages
was always zeroed in memblock, and in __free_one_page() page_is_buddy() was
always returning false, thus we never tried to incorrectly remove it from
the list:

837			list_del(&buddy->lru);

Now, that memory is not zeroed, page_is_buddy() can return true after kexec
when memory is dirty (unfortunately memset(1) with CONFIG_VM_DEBUG does not
catch this case). And proceed further to incorrectly remove buddy from the
list.

OK, I thought this was a regression from one of the recent patches. So
the problem is not new. Why don't we see the same problem during the
standard boot?

Because, I believe, BIOS is zeroing all the memory for us.


This is why we must initialize the computed buddy page beforehand.

Ble, this is really ugly. I will think about it more.


Another approach that I considered is to split loop inside deferred_init_range() into two loops: one where we initialize pages by calling __init_single_page(), another where we free them to buddy allocator by calling deferred_free_range().

Pasha

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux