On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 01:01:45AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Dave Hansen >> <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > Our CR4-based TLB flush currently requries global pages to be >> > supported *and* enabled. But, we really only need for them to be >> > supported. Make the code more robust by alllowing X86_CR4_PGE to >> > clear as well as set. >> > >> > This change was suggested by Kirill Shutemov. >> >> I may have missed something, but why would be ever have CR4.PGE off? > > This came out from me thinking on if we can disable global pages by not > turning on CR4.PGE instead of making _PAGE_GLOBAL zero. > > Dave decided to not take this path, but this change would make > __native_flush_tlb_global_irq_disabled() a bit less fragile in case > if the situation would change in the future. How about just adding a VM_WARN_ON_ONCE, then? --Andy -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
