On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 04:25:32PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > But this report only includes a single (cpu-up) part and therefore is Thanks for fixing me, Peter. I thought '#1 -> #2' and '#2 -> #3', where #2 is 'cpuhp_state', should have been built with two different classes of #2 as the latest code. Sorry for confusing Michal. > not affected by that change other than a lock name changing. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
