On 10/23/2017 08:52 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 10/19/2017 09:03 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: >> On Thu 19-10-17 20:26:57, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >>> Its already assumed that the PageActive flag is clear on the input >>> page, hence page_lru(page) will pick the base LRU for the page. In >>> the same way page_lru(page) will pick active base LRU, once the >>> flag PageActive is set on the page. This change of LRU list should >>> happen implicitly through the page flags instead of being hard >>> coded. >> >> The patch description tells what but it doesn't explain _why_? Does the >> resulting code is better, more optimized or is this a pure readability >> thing? > > Not really. Not only it removes couple of lines of code but it also > makes it look more logical from function flow point of view as well. > >> >> All I can see is that page_lru is more complex and a large part of it >> can be optimized away which has been done manually here. I suspect the >> compiler can deduce the same thing. > > Why not ? I mean, that is the essence of the function page_lru() which > should get us the exact LRU list the page should be on and hence we > should not hand craft these manually. Hi Michal, Did not hear from you on this. So wondering what is the verdict about this patch ? - Anshuman -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
