On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 02:42:49AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> On 11.10.2017 11:22, Abbott Liu wrote:
> > +void __init kasan_map_early_shadow(pgd_t *pgdp)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > + unsigned long start = KASAN_SHADOW_START;
> > + unsigned long end = KASAN_SHADOW_END;
> > + unsigned long addr;
> > + unsigned long next;
> > + pgd_t *pgd;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < PTRS_PER_PTE; i++)
> > + set_pte_at(&init_mm, KASAN_SHADOW_START + i*PAGE_SIZE,
> > + &kasan_zero_pte[i], pfn_pte(
> > + virt_to_pfn(kasan_zero_page),
> > + __pgprot(_L_PTE_DEFAULT | L_PTE_DIRTY | L_PTE_XN)));
>
> Shouldn't all __pgprot's contain L_PTE_MT_WRITETHROUGH ?
One of the architecture restrictions is that the cache attributes of
all aliases should match (but there is a specific workaround that
permits this, provided that the dis-similar mappings aren't accessed
without certain intervening instructions.)
Why should it be L_PTE_MT_WRITETHROUGH, and not the same cache
attributes as the lowmem mapping?
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
