On 16/10/2017 13:33, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15 2017, Guy Shattah wrote:
Why have several driver specific implementation if you can generalize
the idea and implement an already existing POSIX standard?
Why is there a need for contiguous allocation?
This was explained in detail during a talk delivered by me and
Christopher Lameter
during Plumbers conference 2017 @
https://linuxplumbersconf.org/2017/ocw/proposals/4669
Please see the slides there.
If generalisation is the issue, then the solution is to define a common
API where user-space can allocate memory *in the context of* a device.
This provides a ‘give me memory I can use for this device’ request which
is what user space really wants.
Do you suggest to add a whole new common API instead of merely adding a
flag to existing one?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
