Re: [PATCH 2/4] memcg: fix USED bit handling at uncharge in THP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello KAMEZAWA-san,

On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:40:49AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> +void mem_cgroup_split_huge_fixup(struct page *head, struct page *tail)
> +{
> +	struct page_cgroup *head_pc = lookup_page_cgroup(head);
> +	struct page_cgroup *tail_pc = lookup_page_cgroup(tail);
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We have no races witch charge/uncharge but will have races with
> +	 * page state accounting.
> +	 */
> +	move_lock_page_cgroup(head_pc, &flags);
> +
> +	tail_pc->mem_cgroup = head_pc->mem_cgroup;
> +	smp_wmb(); /* see __commit_charge() */

I thought the barriers were needed because charging does not hold the
lru lock.  But here we do, and all the 'lockless' read-sides do so as
well.  Am I missing something or can this barrier be removed?

	Hannes

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]