On Fri, 13 Oct 2017, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 02:16:10AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>
> > static void cramfs_kill_sb(struct super_block *sb)
> > {
> > struct cramfs_sb_info *sbi = CRAMFS_SB(sb);
> >
> > - kill_block_super(sb);
> > + if (IS_ENABLED(CCONFIG_CRAMFS_MTD)) {
> > + if (sbi->mtd_point_size)
> > + mtd_unpoint(sb->s_mtd, 0, sbi->mtd_point_size);
> > + if (sb->s_mtd)
> > + kill_mtd_super(sb);
>
> ...
>
> > + mtd_unpoint(sb->s_mtd, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
> > + err = mtd_point(sb->s_mtd, 0, sbi->size, &sbi->mtd_point_size,
> > + &sbi->linear_virt_addr, &sbi->linear_phys_addr);
> > + if (err || sbi->mtd_point_size != sbi->size) {
>
> What happens if that mtd_point() fails? Note that ->kill_sb() will be
> called anyway and ->mtd_point_size is going to be non-zero here...
mtd_point() always clears sbi->mtd_point_size first thing upon entry
even before it has a chance to fail. So it it fails then
sbi->mtd_point_size will be zero and ->kill_sb() will skip the unpoint
call.
Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
