On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 10:41:39AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > So, you're jumping into this review at v9 where I've split the patches > that take an initial MAP_DIRECT lease out from the patches that take > FL_LAYOUT leases at memory registration time. You can see a previous > attempt in "[PATCH v8 00/14] MAP_DIRECT for DAX RDMA and userspace > flush" which should be in your inbox. The point is that your problem has absolutely nothing to do with mmap, and all with get_user_pages. get_user_pages on DAX doesn't give the same guarantees as on pagecache or anonymous memory, and that is the prbolem we need to fix. In fact I'm pretty sure if we try hard enough (and we might have to try very hard) we can see the same problem with plain direct I/O and without any RDMA involved, e.g. do a larger direct I/O write to memory that is mmap()ed from a DAX file, then truncate the DAX file and reallocate the blocks, and we might corrupt that new file. We'll probably need a special setup where there is little other chance but to reallocate those used blocks. So what we need to do first is to fix get_user_pages vs unmapping DAX mmap()ed blocks, be that from a hole punch, truncate, COW operation, etc. Then we need to look into the special case of a long-living non-transient get_user_pages that RDMA does - we can't just reject any truncate or other operation for that, so that's where something like me layout lease suggestion comes into play - but the call that should get the least is not the mmap - it's the memory registration call that does the get_user_pages. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
