On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 07:50:12AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> +static void ib_umem_lease_break(void *__umem)
> +{
> + struct ib_umem *umem = umem;
> + struct ib_device *idev = umem->context->device;
> + struct device *dev = idev->dma_device;
> + struct scatterlist *sgl = umem->sg_head.sgl;
> +
> + iommu_unmap(umem->iommu, sg_dma_address(sgl) & PAGE_MASK,
> + iommu_sg_num_pages(dev, sgl, umem->npages));
> +}
This looks like an invitation to break your code by random iommu-driver
changes. There is no guarantee that an iommu-backed dma-api
implemenation will map exactly iommu_sg_num_pages() pages for a given
sg-list. In other words, you are mixing the use of the IOMMU-API and the
DMA-API in an incompatible way that only works because you know the
internals of the iommu-drivers.
I've seen in another patch that your changes strictly require an IOMMU,
so you what you should do instead is to switch from the DMA-API to the
IOMMU-API and do the address-space management yourself.
Regards,
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
