On 11.10.2017 01:25, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 06 Oct 2017 14:32:34 +0300 Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If start_code / end_code pointers are screwed then "VmExe" could be bigger
than total executable virtual memory and "VmLib" becomes negative:
VmExe: 294320 kB
VmLib: 18446744073709327564 kB
VmExe and VmLib documented as text segment and shared library code size.
Now their sum will be always equal to mm->exec_vm which sums size of
executable and not writable and not stack areas.
When does this happen? What causes start_code/end_code to get "screwed"?
I don't know exactly what happened.
I've seen this for huge (>2Gb) statically linked binary which has whole world inside.
For it start_code .. end_code range also covers one of rodata sections.
Probably this is bug in customized linker, elf loader or both.
Anyway CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE allows to change these pointers,
thus we cannot trust them without validation.
When these pointers are screwed, the result of end_code-start_code can
still be wrong while not necessarily being negative, yes? In which
case we'll still display incorrect output?
Here we split exec_vm into main code segment and libraries.
Range start_code .. end_code declared as main code segment.
In my case it's bigger than exec_vm, so libraries have to be negative.
After my patch libraries will be 0 and whole exec_vm show as VmExe.
At least sum VmExe + VmLib stays correct and both of them sane.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
