Re: [BUG] mm/vmalloc: ___might_sleep is called under a spinlock in __purge_vmap_area_lazy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 12:00:33PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> The ___might_sleep is called under a spinlock, and the function call graph
> is:
> __purge_vmap_area_lazy (acquire the spinlock)
>   cond_resched_lock
>     ___might_sleep
> 
> In this situation, ___might_sleep may prints error log message because a
> spinlock is held.
> A possible fix is to remove ___might_sleep in cond_resched_lock.
> 
> This bug is found by my static analysis tool and my code review.

This analysis doesn't makes sense.

The point of cond_resched_lock() is that it drops the lock, if resched is
required.

___might_sleep() is called with preempt_offset equal to
PREEMPT_LOCK_OFFSET, so it won't report error if it's the only lock we
hold.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux