Re: [RFC] mmap(MAP_CONTIG)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/04/2017 09:05 AM, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2017, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> 
>>> - Using 'pre-allocated' pages in the fault paths may be intrusive.
>>
>> But we have already faulted in all of them for the mapping and they
>> are also locked. Hence there should not be any page faults any more
>> for the VMA. Am I missing something here ?
> 
> The PTEs may be torn down and have to reestablished through a page faults.
> Page faults would not allocate memory.
> 
>> I am still wondering why wait till fault time not pre fault all of them
>> and populate the page tables.
> 
> They are populated but some processes (swap and migration) may tear them
> down.

As mentioned in my reply to Anshuman, the mention of fault paths here
may be a source of confusion.  I would expect the entire mapping to be
populated at mmap time, and the pages locked.  Therefore, there should
be no swap or migration.

-- 
Mike Kravetz

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [eCos]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]
  Powered by Linux